Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with co.combinatorics
Search options not deleted
user 161853
Enumerative combinatorics, graph theory, order theory, posets, matroids, designs and other discrete structures. It also includes algebraic, analytic and probabilistic combinatorics.
3
votes
0
answers
151
views
On a generalization of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem / Tucker's lemma for a map from simplex to it...
The Borsuk-Ulam theorem is equivalent to $S^{n-1}$ not being a retract of $B^n$. <totally wrong! or else 2+2=4 is equivalent to the Poincare conjecture/thm>
How shall i prove the following stronger v …
