Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Dynamical systems on measure spaces, invariant measures, ergodic averages, mixing properties.
10
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Getting unique ergodicity from minimality
It is known that minimality does not imply unique ergodicity (Furstenberg example). I ask whether the implication holds in following particular situation:
Suppose $X$ is a compact space, $f:X \to …
17
votes
1
answer
611
views
A Rokhlin lemma with a prescribed height function?
Let $T$ be a ergodic automorphism of a non-atomic Lebesgue probability space $(X, \mathcal{A}, \mu)$.
The celebrated Rokhlin tower lemma says that given an integer $n>0$ and $0 < \epsilon < 1$, there …
1
vote
Relationship between Multiplicative Ergodic Theorems
The question has already been answered, so let me just complement what has been said.
The book which I find most accessible is Lang's Fundamentals of Diff. Geom. (it was recommended to me by Karlsso …
2
votes
Quantitative approximation of invariant measures by periodic ones
For a result of a somewhat similar type, check the paper "Rate of approximation of minimizing measures" by Bressaud and Quas, 2007, especially Theorem 4. In their case the dynamics is a subshift of fi …
7
votes
Accepted
A question on invariant measures
Your set consists exactly of weak coboundaries plus constants.
A function $f\in C(X)$ is called a coboundary if $f = h \circ T - h$ for some $h\in C(X)$. A function is called a weak coboundary if it …
6
votes
A metric for Grassmannians
My "answer" is just a (still another) reformulation of Ian's.
Given two subspaces $V$, $W \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ with the same dimension, define their distance as:
$$
d(V,W):= \inf_J \| J - i_V\|
$$
w …