Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ct.category-theory
Search options not deleted
user 1421
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
71
votes
What is an intuitive view of adjoints? (version 1: category theory)
The example I would give a five-year old is the following.
Take the category $\mathbb R$ whose objects are the real numbers (or perhaps rational numbers for the five-year old) and a single
morphism …
- 719