Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with stone-cech-compactification
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 14094
6
votes
Non-trivial convergent sequence in Stone-Čech compactification of $\mathbb{N}$
Here's an answer for sequences of arbitrary ultrafilters (I replace $\mathbf{N}$ by an arbitrary set $X$ since it holds in general). Let $\mathcal{U}_n$ be a sequence of ultrafilters converging to an …
- 4,713
6
votes
Accepted
Stone-Čech boundary is not extremally disconnected
We can suppose $X=\omega$. Let $(X_i)_{i\in I}$ be a continuum family of infinite subsets of $\omega$ with pairwise finite intersection. Define $Y_i=\bar{X_i}-X_i$. So the $Y_i$ are pairwise disjoint …
- 63.9k
11
votes
Is $\beta \mathbb{N}$ homeomorphic to its own square?
The negative answer is equivalent to showing that there are two disjoint subsets $A,B$ of $\mathbf{N}^2$ with non-disjoint closures in $(\beta\mathbf{N})^2$. This be made explicit: take $A=\{(n,m):n=m …
- 63.9k