Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with polynomials
Search options not deleted
user 140486
Questions in which polynomials (single or several variables) play a key role. It is typically important that this tag is combined with other tags; polynomials appear in very different contexts. Please, use at least one of the top-level tags, such as nt.number-theory, co.combinatorics, ac.commutative-algebra, in addition to it. Also, note the more specific tags for some special types of polynomials, e.g., orthogonal-polynomials, symmetric-polynomials.
0
votes
Accepted
SDP representation of ideal polynomials for positivstellensatz refutations
As I guessed, I was missing a fairly trivial piece (and most of my question is not even relevant to the answer).
Free decision variables $a_i$ can be represented in SDPs by the difference of two posi …
- 31
3
votes
1
answer
190
views
SDP representation of ideal polynomials for positivstellensatz refutations
The above paper proceeds in Section 5 by claiming that we can produce this refutation by relaxing it to a hierarchy of SDP feasibility problems, by bounding the degree of the unknown polynomials $s, \alpha_i … My question is on the explicit way to represent the polynomials. …
- 31