Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 1384

Algebraic varieties with group operations given by morphisms, or group objects in the category of algebraic varieties, the category of algebraic schemes, or closely related categories.

9 votes
4 answers
1k views

Structure of cuspidal Bernstein components—do non-commutative endomorphism rings ever really...

Let $F$ be a finite extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ with integers $\mathscr{O}$, let $\mathbb{G}$ be a connected reductive group over $F$ and let $G=\mathbb{G}(F)$ be its $F$-points. Let $X(G)=\operatorna …
30 votes
Accepted

What's the point of a Whittaker model?

This question is a bit like saying "what's the point of the theory of bases for vector spaces -- this just gives you an isomorphism of your space with $\mathbb{R}^n$. What is the point of defining thi …
Pig's user avatar
  • 809
10 votes
Accepted

Type of place versus type of unitary group

Things are perhaps a bit messier than you hope. In particular it is not true that the unitary group is non-quasi-split if and only if $v$ ramifies. Disclaimer: I did not know the answer to this questi …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
3 votes

Representations of reductive groups over arbitrary fields

You've essentially answered your own question. Let $G$ be the units of a division algebra of dimension $n^2$. Then $G$ is an inner form of a general linear group so the Galois action on the root datum …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
5 votes

Compact simple simply connected algebraic groups over $Q_p$ or other local non-archimedean f...

I'm no expert, but I think the theorem is that (for $G$ reductive over a local field $F$) $G(F)$ is compact iff $G$ is $F$-anisotropic, that is, every $F$-torus in $G$ (or equivalently every maximal $ …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
26 votes
Accepted

Relation between Hecke Operator and Hecke Algebra

The fact that Hecke operators (double coset stuff coming from $SL_2(\mathbf{Z})$ acting on modular forms) and Hecke algebras (locally constant functions on $GL_2(\mathbf{Q}_p)$) are related has nothin …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
58 votes
Accepted

What is the difference between PSL_2 and PGL_2?

Yes, the dual of $SL_2$ is $PGL_2$. But you're not going down the right track with $PSL_2$. The problem with $PSL_2$ is that it's not a variety at all! You can quotient out the variety $SL_2$ by the …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Image of a hyperspecial subgroup hyperspecial?

If by "surjective" you mean surjective in the usual sense (for example on $\overline{F}$-points) then maybe you have a problem, because $G_1(F)$ may not surject onto $G_2(F)$. So for example $SL(2)$ s …
Kevin Buzzard's user avatar