Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic varieties with group operations given by morphisms, or group objects in the category of algebraic varieties, the category of algebraic schemes, or closely related categories.
4
votes
Accepted
Image of a hyperspecial subgroup hyperspecial?
If by "surjective" you mean surjective in the usual sense (for example on $\overline{F}$-points) then maybe you have a problem, because $G_1(F)$ may not surject onto $G_2(F)$. So for example $SL(2)$ s …
3
votes
Representations of reductive groups over arbitrary fields
You've essentially answered your own question. Let $G$ be the units of a division algebra of dimension $n^2$. Then $G$ is an inner form of a general linear group so the Galois action on the root datum …
5
votes
Compact simple simply connected algebraic groups over $Q_p$ or other local non-archimedean f...
I'm no expert, but I think the theorem is that (for $G$ reductive over a local field $F$) $G(F)$ is compact iff $G$ is $F$-anisotropic, that is, every $F$-torus in $G$ (or equivalently every maximal $ …
9
votes
4
answers
1k
views
Structure of cuspidal Bernstein components—do non-commutative endomorphism rings ever really...
Let $F$ be a finite extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$ with integers $\mathscr{O}$, let $\mathbb{G}$ be a connected reductive group over $F$ and let $G=\mathbb{G}(F)$ be its $F$-points. Let $X(G)=\operatorna …
58
votes
Accepted
What is the difference between PSL_2 and PGL_2?
Yes, the dual of $SL_2$ is $PGL_2$.
But you're not going down the right track with $PSL_2$. The problem with $PSL_2$ is that it's not a variety at all! You can quotient out the variety $SL_2$ by the …
26
votes
Accepted
Relation between Hecke Operator and Hecke Algebra
The fact that Hecke operators (double coset stuff coming from $SL_2(\mathbf{Z})$ acting on modular forms) and Hecke algebras (locally constant functions on $GL_2(\mathbf{Q}_p)$) are related has nothin …
10
votes
Accepted
Type of place versus type of unitary group
Things are perhaps a bit messier than you hope. In particular it is not true that the unitary group is non-quasi-split if and only if $v$ ramifies. Disclaimer: I did not know the answer to this questi …
30
votes
Accepted
What's the point of a Whittaker model?
This question is a bit like saying "what's the point of the theory of bases for vector spaces -- this just gives you an isomorphism of your space with $\mathbb{R}^n$. What is the point of defining thi …