Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Combinatorial properties of infinite sets. This is a corner-point of set theory and combinatorics.
4
votes
Accepted
Consistency of PSR for general stationary sets $S\subset [H_\kappa]^\omega$
This principle is inconsistent: Let $T\subseteq\omega_1$ be stationary such that $T$ does not contain a club (such a set exists e.g. by Solovay splitting which is certainly overkill). Let for an arbit …
5
votes
1
answer
209
views
Relationship between "infinitely unequal" and "eventually different"
Suppose that $\kappa$ has the property that for every family $A\subseteq\omega^{\omega}$, if $|A|<\kappa$, then there exists some $g\in\omega^{\omega}$ such that for any $f\in A, \exists^{\infty}n\;f( …
3
votes
Accepted
A nonprincipal ultrafilter that is not a $p$-point
First of all, it is clear that the given Partition $\{A_n\;|\;n\in\omega\}$ satisfies $A_n\notin D$ for any n, since $\omega\smallsetminus A_n\in F\subseteq D$ for any n (since $(\omega\smallsetminus …
6
votes
1
answer
292
views
Are the following two "tree properties" equivalent?
Let $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ be cardinals. A thin $(\kappa,\lambda)$-list is a function $L:[\lambda]^{<\kappa}\longrightarrow [\lambda]^{<\kappa}$ such that for all $x\in[\lambda]^{<\kappa}$, $L(x)\subs …
5
votes
1
answer
195
views
Are the completeness Games $G_{\lambda+1}(P)$ and $G_{\lambda^+}(P)$ equivalent for INC?
The completeness game $G_{\gamma}(P)$ for a partial order $P$ has players COM and INC play alternatingly and descendingly elements of $P$ with player INC playing first and player COM playing at limit …