Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with profunctors
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 13480
6
votes
Accepted
grothendieck construction for profunctors
[I guess that by $x_*g$ you mean $D(\mathit{id}, g)(x)$ and by $f^*y$ you mean $D(f, \mathit{id})(y)$.]
Actually, your second construction is the usual Grothendieck construction for "$\mathbf{Cat}$-v …
- 4,096
4
votes
Accepted
Enriched Cauchy completions and underlying categories
It works the other way around --- you should have tried to answer your question by yourself before you posted it here :-)
Yes, there is an equivalence $[X^{op}, V] \simeq [\overline{X}^{op}, V]$. Yo …
- 4,096