Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with operator-norms
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 12898
10
votes
What is the "correct" generalization of operator norms for nonlinear operators?
Probably the answer depends on the context, where you need the generalized concept.
Unfortunately, usually the linearized operator is not bounded anymore, because it contains differential operators.
…
- 4,729
2
votes
Characterizing when matrices are 'dissipative'
The problem has been addressed in the infinite dimensional setting in the following paper:
Máté Matolcsi, On the relation of closed forms and Trotter’s product formula, J. Funct. Anal. 205 (2003), n …
- 4,729