Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with soft-question
Search options not deleted
user 128140
Questions that are about research in mathematics, or about the job of a research mathematician, without being mathematical problems or statements in the strictest sense. Do not use this tag for easy or supposedly easy mathematical questions.
22
votes
How about a statement without proof?
Speaking for myself, I place such a statement in one of two states: I have use of this statement now, or I will file that statement away for future reconsideration. In the latter, it is perpetually …
- 1,068
0
votes
0
answers
214
views
Stories where a different definition lead to an inaccurate conclusion/a misunderstanding/etc
The overall question: What are some good examples where a different understanding of terminology or notation caused you to misinterpret a result in a way that was inaccurate? The intent here is of co …
4
votes
0
answers
267
views
Has the external knit product been used to construct a previously unknown group?
In the Wikipedia article
Zappa–Szép product
, the knit product (a.k.a. Zappa–Szép product, Zappa–Rédei-Szép product, general product, exact factorization) is defined, and its basic properties are laid …