Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 12705

definability by formulas in first-order logic, e.g. as explained at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definable_set, or as in J. Robinson's first-order definition of the integers in the field of rationals

25 votes
Accepted

Is factorial definable using a $\Delta_0$ formula?

Yes, the graph of factorial is $\Delta_0$. As mentioned above by Ali Enayat, a direct $\Delta_0$ definition of factorial was constructed by D’Aquino [4]. It is based on collecting contributions of all …
Emil Jeřábek's user avatar
11 votes

Definability of Gödel's pairing function on ordinals

For $\langle\kappa,{\in}\rangle$, James Hanson has already answered the question as stated. However, let me mention a generalization: it’s not just Gödel’s pairing function that’s not definable in $\l …
Emil Jeřábek's user avatar
9 votes
Accepted

Methods for proving non FO definability

One method is to use quantifier elimination. Note that 0 and $S(x)=x+1$ are definable in $M=(\mathbb N,<)$. The expanded structure $M'=(\mathbb N,<,0,S)$ is a model of the theory $T$ of a discrete lin …
Emil Jeřábek's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Existence property for ordered fields

The answer is negative. For any model $M$, let $M_d$ denote the submodel of its parameter-free definable elements. We have the following characterization for classical theories. Lemma: $T$ has EP if …
Emil Jeřábek's user avatar
6 votes

Ways to define "definability"

What I wrote above is true, but useless by itself, because definability of sets by formulas allowing arbitrary parameters is not an interesting notion (every set is trivially definable from itself as a … For example, one can define an injection $\mathrm{Ord}\times\mathrm{Ord}\to\mathrm{Ord}$, which allows us to take $X=\mathrm{Ord}$, so this generalizes ordinal definability. …
Emil Jeřábek's user avatar