Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with quasi-coherent-modules
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 125523
4
votes
Katz's proof of Cartier's (descent) theorem
I learned this from Victor Ginzburg. Let $S = \mathbb A^1_{k}$, with coordinate $x$ and corresponding vector field $\partial = \frac{d}{dx}$, where $k$ is a field of characteristic $p$. Let $(E,\nabla …
- 2,338