Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with d-modules
Search options not deleted
user 124883
Modules over rings of differential operators.
2
votes
1
answer
99
views
The commutativity of minimal extension and direct image by blowing-down
Let $X$ be a sooth algebraic variety over $\mathbb{C}$.
Let us assume that there exists the commutative diagram
$\require{AMScd}$
\begin{CD}
U @>{i}>> \hat{X}\\
@| @VV{\phi}V\\
U @>{j}>> X
\end{CD}
w …
- 111
3
votes
1
answer
263
views
Is direct image of simple $D$-module is also simple?
(I have asked the question
The commutativity of minimal extension $\cdots$ and I simplify this question to the next simple question:)
Let $X$ be a rational variety over $\mathbb{C}$, $\phi : \hat{X} …
- 111