Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Noncommutative geometry in the sense of Connes and beyond: noncommutative algebras viewed as functions on a noncommutative space.
8
votes
Accepted
Quantization and noncommutative deformations
Well, a lot of questions, some of which Theo already answered in a very nice way. Let me just give some additional remarks and hints how I think about DQ and Poisson geometry in relation to quantum ph …
4
votes
Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebras
For $C^*$-algebras in general, there are many textbooks. Famous names are e.g. the two volume book by Kadison&Ringrose or the (by now somehow old but still very nice) book by Sakai.
I also enjoyed the …
2
votes
Uses of the Chern--Connes Pairing?
I guess you named already one if the biggest points yourself: getting invariants! So more specifically, Connes obtained (with Moscovici and others) invariants of pretty ugly foliations, it helps in th …
2
votes
Quantum Grassmannians?
There is a deformation quantization approach to the quantization of the Grassmannians taking their Kähler symplectic form as the starting point. You can find this in the preprint by Schirmer arXiv:q-a …
15
votes
Relationship between "different" quantum deformations
This is not at all an innocent question as there are really many notions of "quantizing stuff" around. A systematic comparison is probably not available (yet) for several reasons. Let me just try to i …
4
votes
Accepted
Hermitian vector bundles and Hilbert $C^*$-modules
In addition to Nik Weaver's references, let me just sketch the proof which is in fact not very difficult:
A construction of Kaplansky (Rings of operators, Thm 26) shows that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a $*$ …
4
votes
Deformation quantization of a closed Riemann surface with genus >1
One should definitely take a look at the work of Bordemann, Meinrenken, and Schlichenmaier: they provide a Berezin-Toeplitz inspired deformation quantization for all compact quantizable (i.e. the Kähl …