Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with coq
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 12481
Coq is a formal proof management system, also called an interactive theorem prover. It is used to express mathematical assertions, mechanically check proofs of these assertions, find formal proofs, and extract certified programs.
1
vote
How true are theorems proved by Coq?
Taken from the question How bad is Coq proving both $T$ and $\lnot T$?
Back in 2011 on the coq-club mailing list there was a thread:
Is the Daniel Schepler's inconsistency real?. … Proving $T$ and $\lnot T$ doesn't lead to proof of $False$,
with a Coq error. …
- 25.4k
11
votes
How true are theorems proved by Coq?
In an internet post Pollack discusses Coq coercions:
The problem is that Coq coercions are informally specified and behave
somewhat unpredictably. … It is in Coq. Let me be more clear: a bug in the kernel of Coq
Inconsistency bugs appear more common, Preliminary compilation of critical bugs in stable releases of Coq. …
- 25.4k