Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with monads
Search options not deleted
user 124549
4
votes
1
answer
199
views
Do (co)density (co)monadic constructions stablize?
It does not say explicitly, but by considering left/right Kan extension/lift, it could make sense to talk about four variants: (co)density (co)monads. … And since $TF$ is a functor, we can construct its (co)density (co)monads iteratively.
Question
Does such iterative construction stablize?
If not, what's the state of the art about it? …
- 5,230
7
votes
2
answers
545
views
A specific property of bi-adjunction
The corresponding (co)monads are Frobenius monads. I've looked in some paper about them, and couldn't find this structure discussed. …
- 5,230
6
votes
0
answers
350
views
Cohomology without comonad?
TL;DR. Many cohomologies can be unified using comonads. Question: which cohomologies cannot be?
For each algebraic theory, there is an adjunction, and therefore a (co)monad (or called a (co)triple). …
- 5,230