Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ct.category-theory
Search options not deleted
user 12394
Enriched categories, topoi, abelian categories, monoidal categories, homological algebra.
11
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Cayley's Theorem and the Yoneda Lemma [closed]
Hi, from wiki, I know that yoneda lemma is the generalization of Cayley's theorem. But I am not quite understand the intuition behind that. Anyone can help me with that? Cheers!
- 44.4k
4
votes
3
answers
2k
views
prove natural transformation is epimorphism
Let C^ = Cop to Set, for a natural transformation f:X-Y in C^, how to prove if f is an epimorphism, then fc is surjective for all objects c in C? Anyone can help me with that? Thank you in advance:)
- 27.7k
0
votes
1
answer
989
views
how to prove cartesian closed category with finite coproducts is distributive category?
I know that cartesian closed category must have finite products and exponential objects. distributive category must have finite product, finite coproduct and s.t. A*0~0, A*B+A*c~A*(B+C). I think someh …
- 19.6k