Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with geometry-of-numbers
Search options not deleted
user 121716
2
votes
Intuition behind the proof of key step in Minkowski's second inequality on successive minima
As far as I can see it, there are two ideas behind $(\star)$:
First, one argues that it's enough to consider the volumes for $M_q^i$ instead of $M_q^n$. This is the case, because everything is define …
- 21