Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with limsup-and-liminf
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 11919
For questions concerning limit superior and limit inferior of sequences (of real numbers and various generalizations) and also for $\limsup$ and $\liminf$ of sequences of sets.
5
votes
Accepted
Behavior of $m(x)\sqrt{x}$ where $m(x)=\sum_{n\leq x}\frac{\mu(n)}{n}$
This is true by Exercise 4(b) for Section 15.1.1 in Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I (CUP, 2006). The inequality contained therein can surely be proved in much the same way as (15.13 …
- 105k