Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with compressed-sensing
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 118731
3
votes
Accepted
Uniqueness of l1 minimization
Yes, this is true. Since there exists a 'decoder' $Q$ which gives a value on the right hand side (close to or equal to) $\frac{1}{2}$, the pair $(A,Q)$ are $(\ell_\infty, \ell_1)$-instance optimal (se …
- 3,209