Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 118688

Algebraic and topological K-theory, relations with topology, commutative algebra, and operator algebras

5 votes
1 answer
362 views

K-theory for a (geometric) stack

There is a notion of $K$-theory for a manifold $M$. Is there a notion of $K$-theory for a stack $\mathcal{D}\rightarrow \text{Man}$ that is representable by a Lie groupoid $\mathcal{G}$; that is …
2 votes
1 answer
236 views

$C^*$-algebras appearance in study of Lie groupoids and differentiable stacks

I am reading Differentiable stacks, gerbes, and twisted K-Theory by Ping Xu. To talk about (twisted) K-theory of differentiable stacks, author introduced (page $41$) the set up of $C^*$-algebras. All …
0 votes

Looking for an introduction to orbifolds

Eugene Lerman’s Orbifolds as stacks? discuss about orbifolds from point of view of Lie groupoids/Differentiable stacks. The user dvitek mentioned the same paper in a comment to some answer.
Praphulla Koushik's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
932 views

"a sign that one should be computing K-theory"

Allen Knutson said here in comments below the question that I generally regard torsion in (co)homology as a sign that one should be computing K-theory instead, which has less of it. I know one …