Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Algebraic varieties, stacks, sheaves, schemes, moduli spaces, complex geometry, quantum cohomology.
1
vote
0
answers
122
views
Different ways to construct the isogeny category of abelian varieties
Let $k$ be a field and let $\mathbf{AV}_{/k}$ be the category of abelian varieties over $k$. I'm interested in different definitions of the isogeny category of $\mathbf{AV}_{/k}$.
Of course, the isoge …
10
votes
0
answers
184
views
Is every UFD a filtered colimit of Noetherian UFDs?
I'm wondering how one could prove or disprove that any non-Noetherian UFD is a filtered colimit of Noetherian UFDs. This would allow for some absolute Noetherian approximation to be applied for result …
2
votes
0
answers
263
views
Is there any relation between Berkovich spaces over $\Bbb Z$ and Arakelov theory?
As I understand it, both Arakelov geometry and Berkovich geometry over $\Bbb Z$ (or $\mathcal O_K$) consider geometric objects that contain in some sense information about both archimdean and nonarchi …
7
votes
1
answer
351
views
Shouldn't we expect analytic (in the Berkovich sense) étale cohomology of a number field to ...
Let $K$ be a number field. Consider $X=\mathcal{M}(\mathcal O_K)$ the global Berkovich analytic space associated to $\mathcal O_K$ endowed with the norm $\|\cdot\|=\max\limits_{\sigma:K \hookrightarro …