Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 113213
3 votes

How would one formulate large cardinals beyond rank into rank?

Rank-into-rank axioms were initially thought to be close to inconsistency, but over time evidence accumulated that in a sense they are just one point in a natural hierarchy of symmetry principles. Ku …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
8 votes

Large cardinal consistency strength and size

Typically, large cardinals with stronger consistency strength are larger, but there is an important general exception: If a large cardinal axiom is $Σ_{k+1}$, then typically the least example is large …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
5 votes

Classifying set theories whose standard models sharing the same ordinals are equal

For every c.e theory $T$ extending KP (Kripke-Platek) with a model $M$ of height $α<ω_1$, the intersection of all such $M$ is a subset of $L_{α^{+,\mathrm{CK}}}$. This holds since the existence of su …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

Strength of BTEE

BTEE is conservative over the stationary reflection principle (SRP), i.e. ZFC + (schema) {there is $n$-subtle cardinal}$_{n∈\mathbb{N}}$. Using $n$-ineffable in the schema is equivalent. Note that we …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Consistency of "the sharp of every set exists"

In one sense, closure under sharps is itself a standard point in the hierarchy of consistency strengths. Just like the exact consistency strength of "ZFC + measurable" is "ZFC + measurable", so is the …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

1970 question of Reinhardt - how large is this ordinal?

The consistency strength is above that of $n$-iterable cardinals for finite $n$. Thus, despite the seeming weakness of the statement, the $ω$-Erdős upper bound given by Reinhardt is fairly close to t …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

Large cardinals without replacement

Overall, the large cardinal axiom hierarchy is very similar between ZC (ZFC minus replacement; we are including regularity) and ZFC. A large cardinal axiom (unprovable in ZFC) satisfied by $κ$ typica …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Complexity of a proper class of extendibles

No, it is not; existence of a proper class of extendible cardinals is not provable in ZFC from any consistent $Σ^V_5$ statement. Assume a proper class of extendibles and let $φ$ be a true $Σ_5$ state …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
5 votes

Are Berkeley cardinals easier to refute in ZFC than Reinhardt cardinals?

Here is another even simpler refutation. Recall that $δ$ is Berkeley iff for every predicate $A$ and $α≥δ$, there is a nontrivial elementary self-embeding of $(V_α,∈,A)$ with critical point $<δ$. (T …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
2 votes

What sort of cardinal number is the Löwenheim–Skolem number for second-order logic?

The Löwenheim number (compared to LS, this uses sentences rather than theories) for the second order logic $L^2$ is the least $κ$ such that $V_κ$ satisfies all true $Σ_2$ sentences. This $κ$ has cofi …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
3 votes
Accepted

On the strength of higher-logic analogues of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + Montague's Reflection Principle

The first chromatic cardinal is the first Mahlo cardinal. (Per the connection with the reflection in the question, I assume that in the definition, $α$ and the first argument of $c_i$ need not be ina …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
4 votes

On independence and large cardinal strength of physical statements

The examples in this thread are interesting as curiosities, but while one never knows where fundamental explorations will lead, we should be skeptical of their physical applicability. In physics, the …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar
11 votes

Arguments against large cardinals

Large cardinals offer a detailed coherent picture — with a single principle, that of symmetry, reaching even (essentially) the strongest large cardinals. They continually offer new results — without …
Dmytro Taranovsky's user avatar