Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options questions only not deleted user 11115
7 votes
1 answer
498 views

More on Kunen's inconsistency result

I would like to suggest another argument for Kunen's inconsistency result, and I wonder to know if the argument is correct. I am also interested to see, if the proof is correct, which part of the argu …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
1k views

Necessary use of large cardinals in mathematics [duplicate]

There are some statements, whose consistency (or the consistency of their negation) require the existence of large cardinals (in the sense that if the statement (or its negation) is consistent, then i …
5 votes
1 answer
388 views

Adding large sets by countable conditions preserving the GCH

Let $\kappa$ be an inaccessible cardinal. Is there any forcing notion $P$ with the following properties: 1-$P$ preserves GCH and the strong inaccessibility of $\kappa$, 2-$P$ adds a subset of $\kapp …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
12 votes
2 answers
993 views

Kunen's inconsistency result

A well-known result of Kunen says that there is no non-trivial elementary embedding $j: V \rightarrow V.$ There are several proofs of this theorem (see Kanamori, The higher infinite). I wonder to know …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
372 views

Singular Jonsson cardinals

Is the following consistent? $(*)$: There exists a singular cardinal $\kappa$ such that : (1) $\kappa$ is a Jonsson cardinal, (2) $\kappa$ is not a fixed point of the $\aleph-$function, i.e., $\kappa …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
273 views

Strongly compact vs Shelah cardinals

Does Con(ZFC+there exists a strongly compact cardinal) imply the Con(ZFC+there exists a Shelah cardinal)?
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
737 views

Some questions about $0^{\sharp}$ and forcing over $L$

1-Let $P\in L$ be a nontrivial set forcing or even a tame class forcing (tameness in the sense of Sy Friedman; see for example his Handbook paper), and let $G$ be $P-$generic over $L$. Then it is well …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
231 views

A question about strongly compact cardinals

Is the following equiconsistent with the existence of a strongly compact cardinals: For every $\lambda > \kappa$ there exists a $\lambda$-strongly compact embedding $j: V \to M$ with the additiona …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
355 views

$< \aleph_1-$support Product of Cohen forcings

Suppose $\kappa$ is an inaccessible cardinal, and let $P$ be the $< \aleph_1-$support product of $Add(\alpha^{++}, 1)$ for singular cardinals $\alpha < \kappa.$ 1- Does this forcing preserve cardina …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
283 views

what kind of ordinal is the degree of strongness of a partially strong cardinal (Edited and ...

For an infinite cardinal $\kappa$ and an ordinal $\lambda>\kappa,$ $\kappa$ is called $\lambda-$strong, if there is a non-trivial elementary embedding $j: V \rightarrow M$ with $crit(j)=\kappa$ such t …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
19 votes
2 answers
2k views

Woodin's unpublished proof of the global failure of GCH

An unpublished result of Woodin says the following: Theorem. Assuming the existence of large cardinals, it is consistent that $\forall \lambda, 2^{\lambda}=\lambda^{++}.$ In the paper "The generaliz …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
9 votes
4 answers
704 views

Proving ZFC results using large cardinals

There are many $ZFC$ results that their proof uses forcing: The idea is that we force the statement to be true, and then using absoluteness (or other reasons) we conclude that the result is true in $Z …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
14 votes
3 answers
1k views

Questions about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions

"Foreman`s maximality principle" states that every non-trivial forcing notion either adds a real or collapses some cardinals. This principle has many consequences including: 1) $GCH$ fails everywhere …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
758 views

Some questions from the paper "Forcing the failure of CH by adding a real" by Shelah and Woodin

1-Let $P=Add(\omega_1, \kappa)$, and let $D$ be a dense open subset of $P$. Then there is a dense subset $S$ of $D$ such that for every $f \in S$ and any $g \in P$, if $domf=domg$ and the set $\{ \bet …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
387 views

Adding large sets not containing countable ground model sets

The question is motivated by Toni's question "Approximation of infinite set in generic extension" (see Approximation of infinite set in generic extension). Before I state the question, let me add som …
Mohammad Golshani's user avatar

15 30 50 per page