The answer is YES. It suffices to assume that $H_1$ and $H_2$ are conjugate over $\mathbb{C}$ or, what is the same, that they are conjugate over $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$.


   
> **Theorem 1.** Let $G$ be a connected semisimple linear algebraic group defined over a number field $k$. 
There exists a natural number $d=d(G_{\bar{k}})$ with the following property:
if $H_1$ and $H_2$ two connected semisimple $k$-subgroups of $G$ that are conjugate over ${\bar{k}}$,
then there exists a finite field extension $K=K(H_1,H_2)$ of $k$ of degree $[K:k]\le d$ such that $H_1$ and $H_2$ are conjugate over $K$.

*Proof of Theorem 1.* Choose an element $g\in G({\bar{k}})$ such that $g\cdot H_1\cdot g^{-1} =H_2$.
Let $s\in\mathrm{Gal}({\bar{k}}/k)$, then $^s\!g\cdot H_1\cdot \,^s\!g^{-1}=H_2$.
Set $c_s=g^{-1}\cdot \,^s\!g$, then $c_s\in N({\bar{k}})$, where $N$ is the normalizer of $H_1$ in $G$, and $c=(c_s)\in Z^1(k,N)$.
Let $[c]\in H^1(k,N)$ denote the cohomology class of $c$. 

If $[c]=1$, then there exists $n\in N({\bar{k}})$ such that $c_s=n^{-1}\cdot \,^s\!n$ for all $s\in\mathrm{Gal}({\bar{k}}/k)$.
Set $g'=gn^{-1}$, then $g'\in G(k)$ and $g'\cdot H_1\cdot (g')^{-1} =H_2$. We see that if $[c]=1$, then $H_1$ and $H_2$ are conjugate over $k$.

Since there are only finitely many conjugacy classes of connected semisimple subgroups in $G_{\bar{k}}$, see Friedrich Knopp's answer to 
[this question](https://mathoverflow.net/questions/237556/),
 we see that Theorem 1 follows from the next Theorem 2.


> **Theorem 2.** Let $N$ be a linear algebraic group (not necessarily connected or reductive) over a number field $k$. The there exists $d=d(N_{\bar{k}})$
such that any cohomology class $\xi\in H^1(k,N)$ can be killed by a finite field extension $K=K(N,\xi)$ of degree $[K:k]\le d$. 

*Proof of Theorem 2.* We argue by dévissage. If $N_1$ is a normal subgroup of  $N$, and $N_2=N/N_1$, then one sees from the corresponding cohomology exact sequence 
that it suffices to prove the theorem for $N_1$ and $N_2$.

Let $N^0$ denote the identity component of $N$, then $N/N^0$ is a finite group. For a finite group the theorem is clearly true 
(over any perfect field, not necessary a number field), so it suffices to prove the theorem for $N^0$.

We see that we may assume that $N$ is connected (and reductive). Let $R=Z(N)^0$ denote the identity component of the center of $N$, then $R$ is a torus.
For a torus the theorem is clearly true (over any perfect field), so it suffices to prove the theorem for the connected semisimple group $N/R$.

Now let $N$ be a connected semisimple group, $S$ the universal covering of $N$, then we have a short exact sequence
$$ 1\to C\to S\to N\to 1$$
where $S$ is a simply connected semisimple group and $C$ is a finite central subgroup of $S$. We obtain a cohomology exact sequence
$$ H^1(k,S)\to H^1(k,N)\to H^2(k,C).$$

Now we shall use the assumption that $k$ is a number field. We may assume that $k$ has no real embeddings. Then by the Hasse principle for simply connected groups 
we have $H^1(k,S)=1$. Therefore, Theorem 2 follows from the next Proposition 3.


> **Proposition 3.** Let $C$ be a finite abelian $k$-group over a number field $k$. Then there exists $d=d(\#C)$ such that any cohomology class $\eta\in H^2(k,C)$ 
can be killed by a finite field extension $K=K(C,\eta)$ of degree $[K:k]\le d$.

*Proof of Proposition 3.* We may assume that $C$ is constant (i.e, that $C({\bar{k}})=C(k)$. Further, we may assume that $C$ is cyclic.
Further, we may assume that $C=\mu_n$ for some natural $n$. Then
$H^2(K,\mu_n)=\mathrm{Br}(k)_n$ (the subgroup of elements of the Brauer group of $k$ killed by multiplication by $n$).

Let $b\in \mathrm{Br}(k)_n$. We may assume that $k$ has no real embeddings. We know from the class field theory that $b$ defines local invariants $\mathrm{inv}_v(b)\in\frac{1}{n}\mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{Z}$
for all finite places $v$ of $k$, and these local invariants are nonzero only for a finite set $\Xi$ of places. 
By weak approximation there exists a Galois extension $K/k$ of degree $n$ such that $K_v:=K\otimes_k k_v$ is a field for $v\in\Xi$, where $k_v$ is the completion of $k$ at $v$.
Then the extension $K_v/k_v$ kills $\mathrm{inv}_v(b)$ for all $v\in\Xi$, hence the extension $K/k$ of degree $n$ kills $b$. 
This completes the proofs of Proposition 3, Theorem 2, and Theorem 1.