One possible answer could be: by opening any book on vector bundles, and looking at the proposition right after the definition of stable vector bundle. :)

Another possible answer is as follows.

What you ask is valid in much more generality on any compact Kähler manifold.

**Proposition.** *Let $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ two torsion free coherent sheaves over a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$. Then, $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable if and only if $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with $\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G)$.*

Here, $\mu(\mathcal E):=\deg_\omega\mathcal E/\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E$, where
$$
\deg_\omega\mathcal E:=\int_X c_1(\mathcal E)\wedge\omega^{n-1},\quad\dim X=n,
$$
for any torsion free coherent sheaf $\mathcal E$.

*Proof.* Suppose first that $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with the same slope $\mu$. Then, $\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu$. Given a subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, set $\mathcal E_1=\mathcal E\cap(\mathcal F\oplus 0)$ and $\mathcal E_2$ to be the image of $\mathcal E$ under the projection $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G\to\mathcal G$. By the semistability of $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ you have
$$
\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_i)\le\mu\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_i,\quad i=1,2.
$$
Therefore,
$$
\mu(\mathcal E)=\frac{\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_1)+\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_2)}{\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_1+\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_2}\le\mu,
$$
and $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable.

Conversely, you have 
$$
\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G).
$$  
Indeed one has the following lemma, which follows almost immediately from the definition of semistability.

**Lemma.** *If
$$
0\to\mathcal S\to\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0
$$
is a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves on a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$, then
$$
\operatorname{rank}(\mathcal S)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal S))+\operatorname{rank}(\mathcal Q)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal Q))=0.
$$*

Now, this lemma permits to define semistability also in terms of quotient sheaves. Namely, $\mathcal E$ is semistable if and only if for every quotient sheaf $\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0$ of positive rank one has $\mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal Q)$. 

But then, since both $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are at the same time quotient sheaves and subsheaves of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, the equality of slopes follows.

Finally, any subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F$ or $\mathcal G$ is a subsheaf of their direct sum, as well. Hence,
$$
\mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G).\quad\square
$$