Hi, Pete. There are a few observations related to this, not widely known, and that includes your colleague. First, Conway gives a quick proof on page 142 of *The Sensual Quadratic Form*. 

Next, also Conway, the form (five variables) that he and Schneeberger found that represents all the numbers from 1 to 289, fails to represent 290, then represents 291 and on forever, he initially called Methusaleh. It is just a binary added to a ternary that represents the numbers from 1 to 28 consecutive, discriminant 29. However, for ternaries that is not the record. The form he called Baby Methusaleh, discriminant 31, represents 1 to 30 consecutive. The theorem is in this material, as the conditions for a positive ternary to represent, say, 1,2,3,5, places strong restrictions on a partly reduced form. Kap wrote this sort of argument up several times, including a repeat in the unpublished 1996 Classification. It is quite easy. 

Finally, a positive form is anisotropic at the "prime" infinity. In Cassels *Rational Quadratic Forms* he shows global relations on the Hilbert Norm Residue symbol that show that any ternary is anisotropic at an even number of primes. So a positive ternary is anisotropic at an odd number of finite primes. Taken with the observation above that at least one number below 31 is missed, and a positive ternary fails to integrally represent an infinite number of positive integers.
  
I will look up some of my tables and fill things in. Note that some of this is discussed in an early article by William Duke, but he mistyped the form with discriminant 29.