This blog post points out psychometric issues with the Calculus Concept Inventory:

- Spencer Bagley, Jim Gleason, Lisa Rice, Matt Thomas, Diana White, [Does the Calculus Concept Inventory really measure conceptual understanding of Calculus?][1], AMS Blog, July 25, 2016.

This NSF project report, "Year 1 (Expanded) Annual Report for DUE-1625678 Project DIRACC: Developing and Investigating a Rigorous Approach to Conceptual Calculus" discusses a "Calculus 1 Concept Inventory" (C1CI) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319875221_Year_1_Expanded_Annual_Report_for_DUE-1625678_Project_DIRACC_Developing_and_Investigating_a_Rigorous_Approach_to_Conceptual_Calculus; also see https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1625678 which says more about ongoing work.

I also came across a reference to "a validated Statistics Concept Assessment, the
Benchmark Assessment for Statistics Introductory Concepts (BASIC)" in an email to a statistics mailing list from Michael Pearson of the MAA dated Nov 30, 2023.

This website lists a lot of physics concept inventories, but also has a page about math concept inventories:
https://www.physport.org/recommendations/Entry.cfm?ID=124939


  [1]: https://blogs.ams.org/matheducation/2016/07/25/does-the-calculus-concept-inventory-really-measure-conceptual-understanding-of-calculus