Low dimensional topology is unfortunately full of such theorems. Maybe the archetypal example is the Kirby Theorem, which states that surgery on two framed links in S<sup>3</sup> give diffeomorphic 3-manifolds if and only if the links are related by a specific set of combinatorial moves. The result is used routinely, in order to prove that invariants of framed links descend to topological invariants of the manifold (<i>e.g.</i> Reshetikhin-Turaev invariants).

All known proofs of Kirby's Theorem are a nightmare (see <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16848/proofs-of-kirbys-theorem">this MO question</a>). You need to use some heavy tool (Cerf's Theorem/ explicit presentation of Mapping Class Groups) in order to show that some expansion of the space of Morse functions (a Frechet space) is path connected. This is outside the toolbox of most topologists.

I would be surprised if there were 20 people in the world who have read through and understood the details of the proof of Kirby's Theorem. Yet it's routinely used.

There are more mild examples too. The proof that PL 3-manifolds can be smoothed, and that the resulting smooth structure is unique up to isotopy (the exact statement is in Kirby-Seibenmann), is used routinely as though it were obvious, but it is actually quite a hard theorem which is not covered in any of the standard textbooks (Thurston's "3-Manifolds" being an exception). See  <a href="http://www.math.harvard.edu/~lurie/937.html">Lurie's 2009 notes</a>.