Given the Diophantine equation,

$$x_1^k+x_2^k+x_3^k = y_1^k+y_2^k+y_3^k\tag1$$

there is rather the curious observation that the ***smallest*** positive solutions for $k=5$ or $6$ is *multi-grade*.

$$24^k+28^k+67^k=3^k+54^k+62^k,\quad k = 1,5$$

$$15^k + 10^k + 23^k = 3^k + 19^k + 22^k,\quad k = 2,6$$

Duncan Moore has exhaustively searched $(1)$ for all positive solutions below a bound. [Table 1][1] is for $k=5$, while [Table 2][2] is for $k=6$. We can summarize the data below.

**I. Table 1:**

$$\begin{array}{|c|c|c||}
\text{# of solns}&\color{blue}{A=\text{% of}\; (k = 1,5)}&\text{diff}\\
168&63.7\text{%}& \\
336&65.8\text{%}&+2.7\\
672&65.6\text{%}&-0.3 \\
1344&63.6\text{%}&-2.0\\
2688&61.0\text{%}&-2.6\\
5376&59.1\text{%}&-1.9\\
\end{array}$$

*Note:* Each row doubles the $\text{#}$. Since Moore's database has $5393$ solns, and $5393/2^5\approx168$, then that's where I started.

**II. Table 2:**

$$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
\text{# of solns}&\color{blue}{B=\text{% of}\; (k = 2,6)}&\text{diff}\\
50&80\text{%}& \\
100&85\text{%}&+5.0\\
200&89\text{%}&+4.0\\
400&91.7\text{%}&+2.7\\
\end{array}$$

**Questions:**

1. Why is the percentage of $A$ *decreasing*, while that of $B$ is *apparently increasing*? Or will $B$ eventually have a negative diff like $A$? (The data is too small to be conclusive.)
2. If both are decreasing, will $A,B \to 0$? Or will it taper off to some constant? 


**P.S.** Similarly, the smallest solutions to,

$$x_1^k+x_2^k+x_3^k+x_4^k = y_1^k+y_2^k+y_3^k+x_4^k\tag2$$

are **also** multigrades as $k=1,5$, and $k=2,6$, though there are no exhaustive tables for these.
  [1]: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/duncan-moore/taxicab/3_3_5.txt
  [2]: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/duncan-moore/taxicab/3_3_6.txt