The answer is yes. 

Indeed, by rescaling, without loss of generality (wlog) $c=1$. To simplify the notations, let $f:=F$, $a:=a_n$, $b:=b_n$, $c:=c_n$, $t:=\lambda_n$, $D:=D_n$. Passing to a subsequence, wlog $a\to a_*\in[0,1]$ and $t\to t_*\in(0,1]$. Also, wlog $a+2\le c$, since $a\le1$ and $c\to\infty$. Also, wlog $b>c$, since wlog $t>0$ and $c>a$. 

By the convexity of $f$ and inequalities $a+1\le a+2\le c$, 
\begin{equation*}
	f(a+1)\ge f(c)+\frac{a+1-c}{b-c}\,(f(b)-f(c)).\tag{1} 
\end{equation*}
Using now the convexity of $f$ again together with the inequality $a+2\le c$ and (1), we have 
\begin{align*}
	0\le d&:=\frac{f(a)+f(a+2)}2-f(a+1) \\
	&\le \frac{f(a)}2+\frac12\,\frac{(c-a-2)f(a)+2f(c)}{c-a}-f(a+1) \\ 
	&=\tilde d:=\frac{(c-a-1)f(a)+f(c)}{c-a}-f(a+1) \\ 
	&\le\frac{(c-a-1)f(a)+f(c)+D}{c-a} \\
	&\ \ -\Big(f(c)+\frac{a+1-c}{b-c}\,(f(b)-f(c))\Big) \\
	&=\tilde D:=\frac{b-a-1}{b-a}\frac Dt\sim\frac D{t_*}\to0, 
\end{align*}
so that 
\begin{equation*}
	d\to0. \tag{2}
\end{equation*}
On the other hand,
\begin{equation*}
	d\to\frac{f(a_*)+f(a_*+2)}2-f(a_*+1)>0
\end{equation*}
by the strict convexity of $f$. This contradicts (2). $\Box$ 

*Remark:* As seen from the above, condition $c\to\infty$ can be relaxed to $\liminf(c-a)>0$.  

---

The above solution might look somewhat mysterious. In fact, the idea is a rather simple geometric idea. For any real $A,B,C$ such as $A\le B\le C$, let the "gain" $g(A,B;C)$ denote the distance between the point on the graph of the convex function $f$ with abscissa $C$ and the point with the same abscissa on the chord connecting the points on the graph of $f$ with abscissas $A$ and $B$. 

So (see the picture below), $D=g(a,b;c)$ and $\tilde d=g(a,c;a+1)$, where $\tilde d$ is as defined in the above multi-line display. In that display, it was shown that $\tilde d\le\tilde D$, which is clear from the picture. Also, if $t$ is bounded away from $0$ -- that is, if $c/b$ is bounded away from $1$, then, as it is clear from the picture by looking at the similar triangles, we have $\tilde D\asymp D\to0$; cf. the last line of the above multi-line display. This and the inequality $\tilde d\le\tilde D$ imply $\tilde d\to0$. 

By the convexity of $f$, for any fixed real $A,C$ such as $A\le C$, the gain $g(A,B;C)$ is nondecreasing in $B\in[C,\infty)$ (here you may want to draw another picture). Therefore and because $a+2\le c$, we have $d=g(a,a+2;a+1)\le g(a,c;a+1)=\tilde d$, so that $d\le\tilde d$, which was shown in the first three lines of the above multi-line display. 

This is the geometric explanation of (1) and the above multi-line display. 

[![enter image description here][1]][1]


  [1]: https://i.sstatic.net/m2zeO.jpg