I don't know if this serves as a combinatorial interpretation, but the identity can be seen as follows: Firstly it's equivalent to 
$$m\sum_{k=0}^m a_k c_{m-k} = (n+1)\sum_{k=0}^mka_kc_{m-k}\hspace{40pt}(1)$$
If we write $f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kx^k$ then $\sum_{k=0}^m a_k c_{m-k}$ is the $m$-th coefficient of $f^{n+1}(x)$ and the LHS of $(1)$  is the $(m-1)$-th coefficient of $$(f^{n+1})'(x)=(n+1)f^n(x)f'(x)\hspace{50pt}(2)$$
But $f'(x)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+1)a_{k+1}x^k$. Hence the $(m-1)$-th coefficient of the RHS of $(2)$ is $$(n+1)\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}(k+1)a_{k+1}c_{m-1-k}=(n+1)\sum_{k=1}^m ka_kc_{m-k}$$
which equals the RHS of $(1)$.