This post is a sequel to: [Collaboration or acknowledgment?][1] 

The following has come to my attention. A senior mathematician (let us call him or her Alice) suggested a problem to a young mathematician (Bobby) who proceeded to solve it on her own and wrote up the result. Bobby agreed to let Alice be listed as a coauthor, but Alice also insisted to include her PhD student (Charlotte) as a coauthor because they were thinking about the same problem, despite the fact that Alice and Charlotte did not even have partial results. 

Bobby had no problem with Alice joining her as a coauthor for the reasons mentioned by Igor Rivin below (I include you as a coauthor, you write me a good recommendation). Thus, the credit was unfairly diluted by including Charlotte who had not contributed.

**Question 1:** Is there a way for Bobby to manage such a situation without creating conflict?  

**Question 2:** Have questions of co-authorship been discussed somewhere in game theory?

  [1]: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/191507/collaboration-or-acknowledgment