It's easy to answer Question 2 affirmatively by pointing to the groups $G=\mathrm{Sp}(4,q)$ of Lie type $B_2= C_2$ in odd characteristic.  Bhama Srinivasan first worked out the ordinary irreducible characters of $G$ using *ad hoc* methods in her thesis work at Manchester: the resulting paper is <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0220845">here</a> and can be downloaded freely from the AMS site.  She was advised by J.A. Green, whose 1955 paper on characters of finite general linear groups was the inspiration for this approach.  After the landmark *Annals of Mathematics* (1976) paper by Deligne and Lusztig, their generalized characters $R_T^\theta$ could be compared with her work (and then reduced modulo $p$ by Jantzen in his 1987 exposition for the Arcata Conference on Finite Groups).   Some of this comparison is not formally published but was written up in her own notes.

A striking feature of the family of groups of Lie type is the existence of just one cuspidal "unipotent" character (in the later terminology): this was called $\theta_{10}$ by Srinivasan.   She later computed (unpublished) the explicit decomposition of various unipotent characters $R_T^\theta$ (where $\theta$ is the trivial character but $T$ ranges over all types of maximal tori).  This shows that $\theta_{10}$ occurs with coefficient $\pm 1, \pm 2$ in two cases where $T$ is anisotropic, along with other non-cuspidal irreducible unipotent characters.

Quite possibly the answer to Question 1 is yes, though it might not be observed yet in type $B_2$.   To go further I'd have to track down some old work on the groups $G_2(q)$ to identify specific examples (if they exist there).   Following Srinivasan's work, but still prior to 1976, B. Chang and R. Ree worked out the ordinary irreducible characters of these groups (again starting with odd characteristic) in the spirit of Macdonald's conjectures which were later proved by Deligne-Lusztig. 

An obstacle to seeing this much detail is the sheer complexity of writing down explicit decompositions of Deligne-Lusztig characters as $\mathbb{Z}$-linear combinations of ordinary irreducible characters.   So the published work of Lusztig and others has emphasized mainly the theoretical algorithms involved.    But the rank 2 groups do serve as a useful laboratory for experimental work.   For example, a student of Jantzen in Germany wrote his lengthy Diplomarbeit on the groups of type $G_2$ aiming at the reduction modulo $p$ of Deligne-Lusztig characters.   

---------------------------------------------------------------------

A couple of notes about terminology: The reference to a "Frobenius element" $F$ of $G_k$ is out of focus, since the finite group consists of fixed points of a Frobenius *morphism* $F$ of the ambient algebraic group (such as raising all matrix entries to the $q$th power for $q$ a power of $p$).         

Concerning "minisotropic" tori (terminology, like "cuspidal", which I guess comes from the original Harish-Chandra program for representations over real and $p$-adic fields), these are relevant only in reductive groups which are not semisimple---such as general linear groups.   Otherwise one can just refer to "anisotropic" tori over $k$.