This question is related to [question 92206 "What properties make $[0, 1]$ a good candidate for defining fundamental groups?"](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92206/) but is not exactly equivalent in my opinion.  It is even suggested in one of the answers to [92206](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92206/) that "there is nothing fundamental about the unit interval," but i would like to know *what is fundamental about the unit interval*.  I have learned some answers from the answers to [92206](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92206/), but i wonder if there is more.

I have some ideas and have asked already [on Math.StackExchange](http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/322411/), but decided to duplicate here.

One purely topological way to define $[0, 1]$ up to homeomorphism would be to define *path connectedness* first: $x_1$ and $x_2$ are *connected by a path* in a topological space $X$ if for every Hausdorff compact $C$ and $a,b\in C$, there is a continuous $f\colon C\to X$ such that $f(a)=x_1$ and $f(b)=x_2$. Then it can be said that in every Hausdorff space $X$ with $x_1$ and $x_2$ connected by a path, every minimal subspace in which $x_1$ and $x_2$ are still connected by a path is homeomorphic to $[0, 1]$.

Maybe in some sense it can be said that $[0, 1]$ is the "minimal" Hausdorff space $X$ such that every Hausdorff compact embeds into $X^N$ for some $N$, but i do not know if this can be made precise.

In one of the answers to [92206](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92206/) it was stated that $([0, 1], 0, 1)$ is a terminal object in the category of bipointed spaces equipped with the operation of "concatenation."  This is the kind of answers i am interested in.  As [92206](http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92206/) was concerned mostly with the fundamental group and tagged only with [at.algebraic-topology] and [homotopy-theory], i am asking this general topological question separately.