The TC spectrum, at a prime $p$, of this is the homotopy pullback of a diagram
$S^1 \wedge (\Sigma^\infty\_+ \Lambda X)\_{hS^1} \to \Sigma^\infty\_+ \Lambda X \leftarrow \Sigma^\infty\_+ \Lambda X$
after $p$-completion. Here the left-hand map is the $S^1$-transfer from homotopy orbits back to the spectrum and the right-hand map is the difference between the identity and the "$p$'th power" maps on the loop space.
This is in Bökstedt-Hsiang-Madsen's original paper defining topological cyclic homology, in section 5.
ADDED LATER: This doesn't really work on the space level, because they don't have all the structure necessary. They have the $F$ maps, but not the $R$ ones which only come about from stable considerations. Spaces with a group action really only have one notion of "fixed points," namely the honest fixed points of the group action.
However, the associated equivariant spectrum of $\Lambda X$ is built out of spaces like
$$\Omega^V \Sigma^V \Lambda X = Map(S^V, S^V \wedge \Lambda X\_+)$$
where $V$ ranges over representations of $S^1$. This has two "fixed-point" objects for any cyclic group $C$: there's the fixed points, which is the space
$$Map^C(S^V, S^V \wedge \Lambda X\_+)$$
of equivariant maps. There is also the collection of maps-on-fixed-points
$$Map((S^V)^C, (S^V \wedge \Lambda X\_+)^C)$$
which is called the "geometric" fixed point object, and it accepts a map from the ordinary fixed points. The fact that $(\Lambda X)^C \cong \Lambda X$ implies that you can interpret this as a map $(Q \Lambda X)^C \to (Q \Lambda X)$ where the latter uses an accelerated circle. These maps give rise to the $R$ maps in the definition of $TC$, and they definitely rely on the fact that you're considering the associated spectra.