I have an idea to design a type of
_Galton's Board_
to "draw" a relief map of a given two-dimensional function $z=f(x,y)$.
A typical <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bean_machine">_Galton's Board_</a> drops, say, ping-pong balls through a series
of evenly spaced pins into vertical bins to demonstrate that the
balls distribute according to the binomial distribution, approximating
the normal distribution:
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/rODuS.jpg" alt="Galton's Board" />
<br />
(See this 
<a href="http://animation.yihui.name/prob:bean_machine">this link</a>
for an animation.)

First I would like to generalize this design to approximate
an arbitrary function $y=f(x)$, which leads to my first question:

<b>Q1.</b>
Which class of functions can be represented as a convex combination
of normal distributions?

I know these functions are called
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixture_distribution">mixture distributions</a>,
but I have not found a description of the total class representable.
I am hoping that (say) any smooth function can be approximated.

<b>Q2.</b>  Given a function $f(x)$ to approximate, how could one work backward
to a pin distribution that would realize the approximation?

The result would be a type of user-designed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachinko">Pachinko machine</a>.

<b>Q3.</b> Can the above be generalized to two-dimensional functions $f(x,y)$?

Presumably the answer is _Yes_.  If so, one could imagine
a potentially mesmerizing
<a href="https://mathoverflow.net/questions/50343/">Museum of Math</a>
display in which some famous visage emerges slowly as a ping-pong relief map.
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ri3A4.jpg" alt="Imprint Toy" />
<br />
<b>Q4.</b> This final thought raises the question of which mathematician's face would be simultaneously
most appropriate and most recognizable. :-) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galton">Sir Francis Galton</a> is certainly appropriate...