Let $$C = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F_X(x) \log F_X(x) dx $$ and define $$\mathscr{Z}_n = \left\{ x_1,\dots, x_n \in \textrm{Supp}(X) \mid \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) \geq n C \right\}$$ Let $\mathbf Z$ be uniform on $\mathscr{Z}_n$. If $X$ is uniform on its support $\textrm{Supp}(X)$, then $\mathscr{Z}_n =\textrm{Supp}(X)^n$ and the marginals of $\mathscr{Z}_n$ are all $X$. Otherwise, the marginal distribution of $\mathscr{Z}_n$ has pdf proportional to $$\int_{x_2,\dots, x_n \in \textrm{Supp}(X)} A(x_1, x_2,\dots,x_n) dx_2\dots dx_n$$ where $A(x_1, x_2,\dots,x_n) = \begin{cases} 1 & \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) \geq n C \\ 0 & \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) < n C\end{cases}$$ which is equal to $$F_X(x_1) \int_{x_2,\dots, x_n \in \mathbb R} B(x_1, x_2,\dots,x_n) F_X(x_2)\dots F_X(x_n) dx_2\dots dx_n$$ where $B(x_1, x_2,\dots,x_n) = \begin{cases} e^{ n C - \sum_{i=1}^{n} \log F_x(x_i)} & \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) \geq n C \\ 0 & \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) < n C\end{cases}$$ So it suffices to check that the expectation of the random variable $B(x_1,\dots,x_n)$, with $x_2,\dots, x_n$ distributed according to $X$, is independent of $x_1 \in \textrm{Supp}(X)$. In other words, this is the expectation of $$\begin{cases} e^{-y} & y\geq 0 \\ 0 & y <0 \end{cases}$$ where $y = \sum_{i=1}^n \log F_X(x_i) - nC$ By the local central limit theorem, the distribution of $ \sum_{i=2}^n \log F_X(x_i) - (n-1)C$ is approximately a Gaussian with mean $0$ and variance $(n-1) v$ for $v>0$ the variance of $\log F_X(x)$. Because the variance is large, the density is approximately constant near $0$. Thus shifting the distribution by $x_1-C$ will not change the density much, and hence will not change the expectation of $\begin{cases} e^{-y} & y\geq 0 \\ 0 & y <0 \end{cases}$ by very much, so indeed this expectation is independent of $x_1-C$. Alternatively, if $\log F_X(x)$ is supported in an arithmetic progression, then the distribution of $ \sum_{i=2}^n \log F_X(x_i) - (n-1)C$ is approximately a Gaussian restricted to that arithmetic progression, so shifting the distribution by an element of the arithmetic progression will not change the density or the expectation by very much.