$\newcommand{\id}{\text{id}}$ $\newcommand{\Hom}{\text{Hom}}$ This is a [cross-post][2]. Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $2 \le k \le d-1$. Every inner product on $V$ induces an inner product on $\Lambda^k V$: $$ \langle v_1 \wedge \dots \wedge v_k , w_1 \wedge \dots \wedge w_k \rangle:=\det (\langle v_i ,w_j \rangle). $$ **Question:** >What are necessary and sufficient conditions on an inner product on $\Lambda^k V$ to to be induced from a product on $V$? For $k=d-1$ the answer is that every product on $\Lambda^{d-1} V$ [is induced from a product on $V$][1]. **Edit 1:** If there exist an inducing product at the base, this product is **unique** (details are provided under the "edit" [here][2]). Perhaps we can construct an "inverse map" which is defined on the space of products on $\Lambda^k V$, and see when the result is an honest inner product on $V$ (and not just a bilinear form). **Edit 2:** Since the Plucker relations are equivalent to $h\in \Lambda^k (V^* \otimes V^*)$ being decomposable, i.e. $h=g_1\wedge g_2\wedge\dots\wedge g_k$, I think we can focus on the following question: What are the conditions on a decomposable $h$, to have a "root", i.e to be of the form $\Lambda^k g$ for some $g \in V^* \otimes V^*$. (See the second reformulation below for the connection to this problem. The positivity and symmetry of such a root, if exists, "come for free" from the positivity and symmetry of $h$). **An equivalent formulation of the question is the following:** Given $(\binom {d}k)^2$ numbers, indexed by ordered pairs $\big((i_1,\dots,i_k),(j_1,\dots,j_k)\big)$ where $1 \le i_1 <i_2 < \dots<i_k\le d$, under what conditions do they form the $k$ minors of some $d \times d$ matrix? i.e. >$$ b_{(i_1,\dots,i_k),(j_1,\dots,j_k)}=k-\text{minor of a } d \times d \text{ matrix, corresponding to rows } (i_1,\dots,i_k), \text{and to colums} (j_1,\dots,j_k) $$ The equivalence is obtained by choosing a fixed basis $e_1,\dots,e_d$ for $V$, and setting $$b_{(i_1,\dots,i_k),(j_1,\dots,j_k)}=\langle e_{i_1} \wedge \dots \wedge e_{i_k} , e_{j_1} \wedge \dots \wedge e_{j_k} \rangle.$$ Technically, we should also take care of the symmetry and positivity; however, it turns out that if the "upper matrix" $b$ is "symmetric*" and positive, then the underlying matrix $A$ (if exists) is symmetric and definite, and can always be chosen to be positive. *The symmetry of the "matrix $b$" is $b_{(i_1,\dots,i_k),(j_1,\dots,j_k)}=b_{(j_1,\dots,j_k),(i_1,\dots,i_k)}$. The positivity corresponds to $b_{(i_1,\dots,i_k),(i_1,\dots,i_k)} >0$. **Yet another equivalent formulation...:** A choice of a product on $V$ is equivalent to a choise of a linear isomorphism $ g:V \to V^*$ that satisfies $$ g(v)(w)=g(w)(v) \, \, \text{and}\, \,g(v)(v) \ge 0 \, \, \text{with equality only when } \, v=0. \tag{1}$$ The equivalence is via $g(v)(w):= \langle v,w \rangle$. Using this perspective, the induced metric on $\Lambda^{k} V$ induced by $g$ is $\Lambda^kg:\Lambda^{k} V \to \Lambda^{k} (V^*) \cong (\Lambda^{k} V)^*$. So, the question becomes the following: >For which maps $h:\Lambda^{k} V \to (\Lambda^{k} V)^*$ which are symmetric and positive in the sense of $(1)$, there exist a symmetric and positive $g$ such that $h=\Lambda^kg$? **As mentioned before, if there exist a "root" $g$ such that $h=\Lambda^kg$, then $g$ is symmetric and can be taken to be positive definite.** [1]:https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2599787/104576 [2]:https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2584783/which-metrics-on-exterior-power-are-induced-from-metrics-on-the-base