Note: Posting in MO since it was [unanswered in MSE][1] **Definition**: We say that a natural number $n$ has triangular divisors if it has at least one triplet of divisors $n = d_1d_2d_3, 1 \le d_1 \le d_2 \le d_3$, such that $d_1,d_2$ and $d_3$ form the sides of a non-degenerate triangle. **Eg**: $60$ has triangular divisors because $60 = 3.4.5$ and $3,4,5$ form a triangle. Note that another triplet of divisors of $60 = 1.4.15$ does not form a triangle but because of the triplet $3,4,5$ the number $60$ qualifies a number with triangular divisors. On the other the number $10$ does not have any triplet of triangular divisors. The first few numbers in this sequence are $$ 1,4,8,9,12,16,18,24,25,27,32,36,40,45,48,\ldots $$ I am interested in the density of these numbers. In the linked questions users commented that the almost all integers are expected this property since because most numbers will have a several small prime factors so the natural density was initially thought to be $1$. However, quite counter intuitively, in one of the long comment which was posted as an answer in the linked question, it was proved that if $n$ has triangular divisors then the largest prime factor of $n$ is less than $\sqrt n$ which immediately implies that the natural density of numbers with triangular divisors is $ < 1 - \log 2 \approx 0.3069$. Experimentally, the data shows that the natural density approaches $0$. Let $f(x)$ be the number of integers $\le x$ with triangular divisors. We have $$ f(46732002) = 3630678 $$ The graph of $\frac{f(x)}{x}$ vs $x$ given below shows that the density decreases as $x$ increases. **Experimental data**: Let $f(x)$ be the number of integers $\le x$ with this property. The graph of $\frac{f(x)}{x}$ vs. $x$ is shown below. [![enter image description here][2]][2] A simple curve fitting gives $\frac{a}{\log x}$ as a good fit with $R^2 = 0.9977$ which suggests that $f(x)$ growth rate somewhere close to a constant times the prime counting function $\pi(x)$. This is rather counter intuitive as mentioned in the comments that we expect almost all integers to have this property. **Higher density of even numbers**: A curious observation is the there are significantly more even numbers with triangular divisors as compared to odd numbers. Let $f_o(x)$ be the number of odd numbers $\le x$ with triangular divisors. The graph of $\frac{f_o(x)}{f(x)}$ is shown below. [![enter image description here][3]][3] > **Question**: How many numbers $\le x$ have triangular divisors and why are even numbers more dense than odd numbers? **Related question**: [Reshaping an object into two integer sided cuboids without changing the total volume][4]. [1]: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3567689/how-many-numbers-le-x-can-be-factorized-into-three-numbers-which-form-the-sid [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/UbSFS.png [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/NcbVK.png [4]: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3568588/reshaping-an-object-into-two-integer-sided-cuboids-without-changing-the-total-vo