Slightly weaker bound via a more robust method
Below I present an alternative method with slightly worst upper-bound than in the accepted answer, namely $d^{-1+o(1)}$ instead of $d^{-1}$.
The advantage of the new method is that it can be applied to one-dimensional projections of arbitrary isotropic log-concave distributions (thanks to Klartag's CLT for convex bodies, namely Theorem 1.3 of this paper).
Let $F$ be the marginal cdf of $\sqrt{d}x_1$ and let $F^c := 1 - F$ be its survival function. Let $\Phi$ be the standard gaudssian cdf.
We will make use of the following fact (see ref https://mathoverflow.net/a/315232/78539)
Fact 1. $\sup_{t \in \mathbb R}|F(t) - \Phi(t)| \le C/d$, for an absolute constant $C>0$ which doesn't depend on $d$.
We shall also need the following fact (which follows from Gaussian concentration of $N(0,1)$ and sub-exponential concentration of $x_1$)
Fact 2. There exists an absolute constant $b>0$ such that $\max(F(-t),\Phi(-t),F^c(t),\Phi^c(t)) \le e^{-bt}$ for sufficiently large $t>0$.
Now, for any $T > 0$, one computes $$ W_1(\sqrt{d}x_1,N(0,1)) = \int_{\mathbb R} |F(t)-\Phi(t)|dt = A_1(T) + A_2(T) + A_3(T), $$ where the first is a a classical result (e.g see Proposition 2.17 of Santambrogio's OTAM), and the $A_k(T)$'s are defined by $$ \begin{split} A_1(T) &:= \int_{-\infty}^{-T}|F(t)-\Phi(t)|dt,\\ A_2(T) &:= \int_{-T}^T|F(t)-\Phi(t)|dt,\\ A_3(T) &:= \int_{T}^\infty|F(t)-\Phi(t)|dt=\int_{T}^\infty|F^c(t)-\Phi^c(t)|dt. \end{split} $$
Thanks to Fact 1, we know that $A_2(T) = \mathcal O(T/d)$. On the other hand, thanks to Fact 2 we have for sufficiently large $T>0$, $$ A_1(T) \le \int_{-\infty}^{-T} \max(F(t),\Phi(t))dt \le \int_{-\infty}^{-T} e^{bt}dt = e^{-bT}/b. $$
By a symmetric argument, we also have $A_3(T) \le e^{-bT}/b$. Taking $T=(\log d)/b$ then gives $A_2(T) = \mathcal O((\log d)/d)$ and $A_1(T),A_3(T) = \mathcal O(1/d)$. Thus $$ W_1(x_1,N(0,1/d)) = W_1(\sqrt{d} x_1,N(0,1)) = \mathcal O(\frac{\log d}{d})=\mathcal O(d^{-1+o(1)}). $$