I am quite curious about the definition and applications of the primary decomposition for modules.
- The definition of a primary submodule. (Let's assume we work over a commutative noetherian ring R and an R-module M) When I first worked on Atiyah-Macdonald I used this definition:
A submodule N of M is primary if any zero divisor on M/N is nilpotent.
But recently I saw the definition in Matsumura's commutative algebra, which is slightly different:
A submodule N of M is primary if any zero divisor on M/N is locally nilpotent, i.e. if a is a zero divisor, then for any x in M/N, there exists n possibliy depending on x such that a^n x = 0.
Of course, these two definitions agree when M is a finite R-module. (which I guess is the most interesting case) But what should be the "right" definition in the general situation?
2 The application of this. Is this generality of any use? If M is finite, then I know it admits a filtration with quotients being R/p_i where p_i are associated primes. This seems to be quite useful in some proofs. But what about the case where M is infinite?
3 Geometric meaning. Primary decomposition of an ideal I in R is related to the irreducible components of Spec R/I. Is there something similar for the module case?
Thanks very much!