Suppose that a billiard ball bouncing in a unit square (or a lightray reflecting
in a mirrored square) has the property that the angle of reflection is a fraction
of the angle of incidence, rather than equal to it. What are the dynamics?
I explored this a bit with the angle of reflection $\frac{1}{2}$ the angle of incidence,
and was surprised to discover that, regardless of the starting angle, the path quickly
converges to follow $30^\circ{-}60^\circ{-}90^\circ$ triangles:
<hr />
![RayInSquareSkewed][1]
<hr />
This is because (a) the ray alternates hitting a vertical and a horizontal
square side, i.e., it never bounces twice in a row on opposing horizontal
or opposing vertical sides, and (b) $\alpha = (\pi/2 - \alpha)/2$ solves to $\alpha=\pi/6$.
(*Added*.)
Moreover, the filling behavior is quite different. Below shows the paths for
$200$ reflections, starting
with the same irrational slope, when angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence (left),
and when the angle of reflection is half the angle of incidence (right).
The path itself converges, not only its angles.
<hr />
![RaysInSqurare200ab][2]
<hr />
This remarkably predictable behavior
has made me wonder what might be the dynamics when reflection
angles are some other fraction of the incident angles, and when the
"billiard table" is a nonsquare rectangle, or other some convex shape.
Very likely these questions have been explored. If so, I would appreciate pointers—Thanks!
[1]: https://i.sstatic.net/dLTUJ.jpg
[2]: https://i.sstatic.net/9CRqB.jpg