It's been weeks (months?) since the 2048 game--by Gabriele Cirulli--took Internet by storm. I have an explicit integer $X$ which is greater or equal than any score of this game. Possibly my $X$ is the actual maximal score, I don't know, it may go either way. Thus my question: what is the maximal possible score for game 2048? (I'll provide $X$ in an answer below, as a SPOILER; it was quite straightforward to get $X$, and similar upper bounds for a way larger family of similar games). If $X$ is not sharp than sharper bounds are welcome too.

BTW, have anybody published an upper bound for 2048 on Internet or elsewere? (If there is a respective link then I'd like to see the article).

<hr>
**REMARK:** *While the earlier nice post:*

&nbsp; http://mathoverflow.net/questions/160703/expected-halting-time-for-the-2n-game-aka-2048-with-random-moves

*is related to the game 2048, this post and my question and my answer below are otherwise **not** related. It's nice to know about both posts, but that's all.*

*The other two posts mentioned provided a construction but not a **proof** that it provides maximum, and there is no other **proof** of a specific lower bound there. Their style seems to be of the type: I cannot do it better (without even attempting a mathematical proof of a bound). Please, show me in those posts that it's otherwise (a feeling that a construction is the best is not a proof).*

**PS:** &nbsp; I'd like to see a quote of an essential moment of a **rigorous** proof of an upper bound for a maximal **tile**.

Here, since I have my bound for the maximal tile, let me **follow it** with an upper bound for the **total** sum. Actually, it is obtained as corollary to a maximal configuration (even if such a configuration can be fictitious--nevertheless, all tiles have values not exceeding the respective tiles of the *fictitious* configuration).

Once again, it will be easier to consider the general *templates* (see the answer below) and the logarithmic notation. (*To be continued. I have network problems*).