Skip to main content
1 of 3
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

By Theorem 1.2 in this paper, Robin's Inequality is true for every odd integer $n>8$. If we knew what the OP wants to prove, then we would also know Robin's Inequality for every integer $n$ whose odd part exceeds $5040$. In particular, we would know Robin's Inequality for every colossally abundant number exceeding $5040$, because each colossally abundant number divides the next one. So, by Proposition 1 in Section 3 of Robin's paper, we would even know Robin's Inequality for every integer exceeding $5040$, which is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis.

In short, it is hopeless to prove what the OP wants to prove, because it implies the Riemann Hypothesis.

GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398