Skip to main content
2 of 2
deleted 154 characters in body
Tim Campion
  • 63.9k
  • 13
  • 143
  • 384

How complicated can a finite double complex over a field be?

A finite complex over a field $k$ is pretty simple: it's the direct sum of its homology with a split-exact complex. How complicated can a finite double complex be? Does it make a difference if $k$ is algebraically closed?

It seems as though quiver representation theory may be relevant here, but since a double complex is a representation of a quiver with relations, I'm not really sure where to start looking. So my question is:

Question: Let $k$ be a field. How complicated is the category of finite-(total) dimensional double complexes over $k$?

Tim Campion
  • 63.9k
  • 13
  • 143
  • 384