Skip to main content
5 of 12
edited tags, improved style
Wolfgang
  • 13.4k
  • 5
  • 45
  • 102

Q2 : A new generalisation of dimension?

I worked this theory : A new generalization of the dimension?

I have a theorem about dimensions which is more general and simple than for matroids.

Definition 1: A structure $S$, is a pair $(X, \mathcal T)$ with $X$ a set and $\mathcal T$ a set of subsets of $X$ which is stable w.r.t. arbitrary intersections, with $X \in \mathcal T$.

Definition 2: For $U \subset X$, we denote $\langle U\rangle_S:=\bigcap \limits_{F \in \mathcal T, U \subset F} F$.

Definition 3: For a structure $S=(X,\mathcal T)$, we say the set $U\neq \emptyset$ is free if :

$\forall u \in U, u \notin \langle v \mid v \in U,v\neq u \rangle_S$

Definition 4: For a structure $S=(X,\mathcal T)$, we say this structure has a dimension if:

$\forall U \subset X$ free and $v \notin \langle U\rangle_S$, the set $U \cup \{v\}$ is free.

Definition 5: For a structure $S=(X,\mathcal T)$ and $F \in \mathcal T$, we denote $\dim(F)=n$ if:

the largest free set of $F$ has a cardinality of $n$.

Theorem: For a structure $S=(X,\mathcal T)$ with a dimension and $E,F \in \mathcal T$,

if $\dim(E)=\dim(F)<\infty$ and $E \subset F$ then $E=F$

Question: Is this generalization of the dimension already known?

Dattier
  • 4.1k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 46