Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a Lie groupoid. The target map $t:\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$ is a principal $\mathcal{G}$ bundle.

This article Orbifolds as Stacks? by Eugene Lerman calls (in page $11$) this particular principal bundle to be the unit principal $\mathcal{G}$ bundle. So, for a Lie groupoid $\mathcal{G}$, this $\mathcal{G}$ bundle is a special element in $B\mathcal{G}$.

Let $\mathcal{G}$ and $\mathcal{H}$ be Lie groupoids. For $B\mathcal{G}$, I have a special element $t:\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$. For $B\mathcal{H}$, I have a special element $t:\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$.

Is it the case that any morphism of stacks $B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow B\mathcal{H}$ should take this special element $t:\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$ to the special element $t:\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$? I could not see why this is true from definition of map of stacks but I feel this should be the case. Any comments are welcome.

Edit : A stack (over the category of manifolds $\text{Man}$) for me is a category $\mathcal{D}$ along with a functor $\mathcal{D}\rightarrow \text{Man}$ such that it is a category fibered in groupoids and some extra conditions. By an element of stack I mean an element (object) in the category $\mathcal{D}$.

Consider the special case when this map of stacks $B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow B\mathcal{H}$ is coming from a morphism of Lie groupoids $\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$. I will recall how one gets $B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow B\mathcal{H}$ from $\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$.

We first construct a $\mathcal{G}-\mathcal{H}$ bibundle given $\phi:\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$. We consider principal $\mathcal{H}$ bundle $t:\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$, pull it back along $\phi:\mathcal{G}_0\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$ to get a principal $\mathcal{H}$ bundle, now with the base $\mathcal{G}_0$ which is precisely $\mathcal{G}_0\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$. The manifold $\mathcal{G}_0\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1$ has an action of $\mathcal{G}$ on it, given by $g.(x,h)=(t(g),\phi(g)h)$. With this action, it becomes a $\mathcal{G}-\mathcal{H}$ bibundle.

This $\mathcal{G}-\mathcal{H}$ bibundle gives morphism of stacks $B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow B\mathcal{H}$ the map is given by composition of bibundle. The object $\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$ is mapped to $\left(\mathcal{G}_1\times_{\mathcal{G}_0}(\mathcal{G}_0\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1)\right)/\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$ which comes from following diagram

We have $\mathcal{G}_1\times_{\mathcal{G}_0}(\mathcal{G}_0\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1)=\mathcal{G}_1\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1$ and $(\mathcal{G}_1\times_{\mathcal{H}_0}\mathcal{H}_1)/\mathcal{G}_1=\mathcal{H}_1$. So, the principal bundle is $\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$.

If $\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$ is a Lie groupoid extension, then we have $\mathcal{H}_0=\mathcal{G}_0$ and $\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_0$ is just the target map $t:\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow \mathcal{H}_0$.

So, if $F:B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow B\mathcal{H}$ is given by a morphism of Lie groupoids $\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \mathcal{H}$ which is a Lie groupoid extension, then $F(t:\mathcal{G}_1\rightarrow M)=t:\mathcal{H}_1\rightarrow M$.

Otherwise, it does not make sense to ask if $F$ takes unit principal bundle of $\mathcal{G}$ to unit principal bundle of $\mathcal{H}$.