The answer is yes if $R$ is any atomic domain, e.g., $R$ is a Noetherian domain.
Claim 1. Let $R$ be any integral domain. The set $S = S_R$ is saturated in the sense that if $ab \in S_R$ for some $a,b \in R$, then $a \in S_R$.
Proof. Let $x \in R$ and let $I = Ra + Rx$. As $Ib$ is principal, so is $I$.
Lemma. Let $R$ be any integral domain. If $p \in S_R$ is irreducible, then $Rp$ is maximal. In particular, $p$ is prime.
Proof. Let $p$ be an irreducible element in $S_R$. Given $x \in R \setminus Rp$, there is $d \in R$ such that $Rp + Rx = Rd$. As $d$ divides both $p$ and $x$ and $p$ doesn't divide $x$, the element $d$ is a unit. Therefore $Rp + Rx = R$.
Claim 2. If $R$ is an atomic domain, then $S_R$ is multiplicatively closed.
Proof. Since $S_R$ is saturated and $R$ is atomic, it suffices to show that $pa \in S_R$ for every irreducible element $p \in S_R$ and every $a \in S_R$. To do so, consider $x \in R$. If $x \in Rp$, write $x = px'$. As $a \in S_R$, there is $d \in R$ such that $Ra + Rx' = Rd$. Hence $Rpa + Rx = Rpd$. If $x \notin Rp$, then $Rp + Rx = R$ by the above lemma. As $a \in R$, we can find $d \in R$ such that $Ra + Rx = Rd$. Writing $1$ (resp. $d$) as a linear combination of $p$ and $x$ (resp. of $a$ and $x$), we observe that $d = 1 \cdot d \in Rpa + Rx$. Therefore $Rpa + Rx = Rd$, which completes the proof.
Let us denote by $R^{\times}$ the unit group of $R$. I can only produce examples of sets $S_R$ which are either $R \setminus \{0\}$ (obtained, e.g., when $R$ is a Bézout domain) or $R^{\times}$ (obtained, e.g., for $R = \mathbb{Z}[X]$, a non-Bézout unique factorization domain).
Still, Claim 1 can be used to inspect the state of affairs regarding polynomial rings $R[X]$ with $R$ an integral domain. For those rings $R$, the set $S = S_{R[X]}$ is one of the two trivial sets on many instances. We call $f \in R[X]$ a $u$-polynomial if $f(r)$ is a unit of $R$ for every $r \in R$.
Claim 3. Let $R$ be an integral domain which is not a field. Assume moreover that $R$ is a unique factorization domain (UFD) with infinitely many primes or that there is no non-constant $u$-polynomial over $R$. Then $S_{R[X]} = (R[X])^{\times} \simeq R^{\times}$.
Proof. We begin with an observation. Let $a, b \in R$. As the ideal generated by $a$ and $X - b$ is principal if and only if $a \in R^{\times}$, we deduce that $a \notin S_{R[X]}$ and $X - b \notin S_{R[X]}$ for every $a \in R \setminus R^{\times}$ and every $b \in R$. Now let $f \in S_{R[X]}$ and let $a \in R \setminus \{0\}$. The ideal generated by $f$ and $a$ is a principal ideal generated by some $g \in R[X]$. Since $g$ divides $a$ and $f$, it is a constant polynomial which lies in $S_{R[X]}$ by Claim 1. Hence $g$ is unit of $R$ by the above remark. As result, the reduction of $f$ modulo $Ra$ is a unit of $(R/aR)[X]$ for every non-zero element $a$ of $R$. If $R$ is a UFD with infinitely many primes, then $f$ must be a constant polynomial, hence a unit. Otherwise, let us consider the ideal generated by $f$ and $X - b$ for some $b \in R$. It is a principal ideal generated by some $h \in R[X]$ which divides both $f$ and $X - b$. As it cannot be $X - b$ multiplied by a unit of $R$ by our first remark, it is a unit of $R$. Therefore $f(b)$ is a unit of $R$ too. Since this holds for every $b \in R$, $f$ is $u$-polynomial.
Note that non-constant $u$-polynomials over UFDs which aren't fields do exist, see e.g., [1, Example 3.b]. Indeed, take $\mathcal{P} =\{p \text{ prime } \vert\, p \equiv 3 \text{ mod } 4 \} \subset \mathbb{Z}$ and set $$\mathbb{Z}_{\mathcal{P}} = \{ \text{ rational numbers } \frac{m}{n} \text{ with no prime factor of } n \text{ in } \mathcal{P}\}.$$ Then $x^2 + 1$ is $u$-polynomial over the UFD $\mathbb{Z}_{\mathcal{P}}$.
In the course of Claim 3's proof, we showed
Claim 4. Let $R$ be an integral domain which is not a field. Then every element of $S_{R[X]}$ is a $u$-polynomial over $R$.
This easily yields
Claim 5. Let $R$ be any integral domain. Then $S_{R[X, Y]} = (R[X, Y])^{\times} \simeq R^{\times}$.
The OP defines a seemingly narrower set $$N_R = \{ a \in R \setminus \{0\}\} : a \vert x \text{ or } x \vert a \text{ for every } x \in R\}$$ which satisfies $$R^{\times} \subset N_R \subset S_R \subset R \setminus \{0\}.$$
OP's first claim. If $R$ is a local domain, then $S_R = N_R$.
OP's second claim. If $R$ is any integral domain, then $N_R$ is multiplicatively closed and saturated.
From this, we infer
Corollary 1. If $R$ is an atomic domain with at least two distinct irreducible elements, then $N_R = R^{\times}.$
Proof. As $R$ has at least two distinct irreducible elements, $N_R$ cannot contain any irreducible element. Since $N_R$ is saturated and $R$ is atomic, $N_R$ cannot contain any non-unit element.
In particular, we have $S_R = R^{\times}$ for any regular local domain $R$ which is not a principal ideal domain. We also obtain
Remark. If $R$ is a principal ideal domain with more than one prime, then $R^{\times} = N_R \subsetneq S_R = R \setminus \{ 0 \}$.
We obtain an alternative for Noetherian local domains $R$ with Krull dimension $1$: either $R$ is a principal ideal domain and obviously $S_R = R \setminus \{ 0 \}$, or $R$ isn't and $S_R = R^{\times}$. This follows from
Corollary 2. Assume that $R$ is an atomic domain such that $S_R = N_R$, e.g, $R$ is a Noetherian local domain. Then either $R$ is a local domain with a principal maximal ideal and $S_R = R \setminus \{0\}$ or $S_R = R^{\times}$.
Proof. Assume that $S_R$ contains a non-unit element. As $R$ is atomic and $S_R$ is saturated, the set $S_R$ contains an irreducible element $p$. Since $p \in N_R$, the element $p$ divides any non-unit of $R$. Therefore $Rp$ is the unique maximal ideal of $R$.
[1] S. H. Weintraub, "Values of polynomials over integral domains", 2014.